Contemporary trends in management of stage 1 seminoma.

PURPOSE: Surveillance is now the preferred treatment strategy for patients with stage 1A/1B seminoma as reflected by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. In this study, we aimed to describe trends in adjuvant management strategy for stage 1A/B seminoma from 2004 to 2016 using the National Cancer Database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The database was queried for patients diagnosed with stage 1A/1B seminoma between 2004 and 2016. Staging was determined using the American Joint Committee on Cancer guidelines. Surveillance was defined as no treatment with chemotherapy or radiation within 60 days of diagnosis. Proportions of cancer patients utilizing surveillance, radiation, and single-agent chemotherapy were summarized annually. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare overall survival between groups. RESULTS: 8,686 patients with stage 1A/1B seminoma met inclusion criteria over the course of the study period. Overall, 3,004 (34.6%) patients began adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation within 60 days. Utilization of surveillance increased from 39.8% in 2004 to 86.8% in 2016 while utilization of radiation decreased from 59.7% to 4.6%. High-volume centers adopted surveillance earlier than low-volume centers. CONCLUSION: This study describes trends in utilization of surveillance, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy for stage 1A/1B seminoma over 12 years. A major shift from utilization of adjuvant treatment to surveillance in patients with stage 1A/B seminoma is observed in this large national cancer database; a minority of patients now receive adjuvant treatment and risk-related toxicities. Survival analysis reveals similar survival at a median 5-year follow-up. The results provide insight into the time needed for clinical practice to adopt the preferred approach of surveillance over the time period studied.

Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy improves survival in 1897 testicular Lymphoma patients from a contemporary cohort.

INTRODUCTION: The standard of care (SOC) for primary testicular lymphoma (PTL) is orchiectomy, chemotherapy (CHT), and radiotherapy (RT). We hypothesized that men may not receive SOC and may have worse outcomes. To assess this, we queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to analyze treatment patterns and survival in PTL patients. METHODS: The NCDB was queried (2006-2016) for men diagnosed with extranodal lymphoma with primary site testis. Patients were placed in 2 treatment groups (1) orchiectomy with chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (CHT + RT), named the SOC group; and 2) CHT + orchiectomy, or RT + orchiectomy, or orchiectomy alone, grouped as non-SOC. Propensity score matching and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to investigate 5-year overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Two thousand two hundred thirty-two men with PTL underwent orchiectomy. After exclusions, 891 men were included in the SOC group and 1,006 men were included in the non-SOC group. KM analysis showed 5-year OS was significantly higher in the SOC group vs. non-SOC for all stages (hazard ratio = 0.54, with 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 0.65, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study represents one of the largest PTL cohort reported to date reflecting current treatments and shows men receiving standard of care treatment have significantly improved survival. Additionally, analysis reveals that most men included in the NCDB do not receive the standard of care.

A prospective analysis of health-related quality of life in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients managed with intensity modulated radiation therapy, with vs. without hormonal therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Combined radiotherapy and hormonal treatment are recommended for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (CaP). This study compared the long-term effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of intermediate- and high-risk CaP patients managed with radiation therapy (RT) with vs. without hormone therapy (HT). METHODS: Patients with intermediate- and high-risk CaP enrolled in the Center for Prostate Disease Research diagnosed from 2007 to 2017 were included. EPIC and SF-36 questionnaires were completed and HRQoL scores were compared for patients receiving RT vs. RT + HT at baseline (pretreatment), 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after CaP diagnosis. Longitudinal patterns of change in HRQoL were modeled using linear regression models, adjusting for baseline HRQoL, age at CaP diagnosis, race, comorbidities, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk stratum, time to treatment, and follow-up time. RESULTS: Of 164 patients, 93 (56.7%) received RT alone and 71 (43.3%) received RT + HT. Both groups reported comparable baseline HRQoL. Patients receiving RT+HT were more likely to be NCCN high risk as compared to those receiving only RT. The RT + HT patients experienced worse sexual function, hormonal function, and hormonal bother than those who only received RT; however, HRQoL recovered over time for the RT + HT group. No significant differences were observed between groups in urinary and bowel domains or SF-36 mental and physical scores. CONCLUSION: Combined RT + HT treatment was associated with temporary lower scores in sexual and hormonal HRQoL compared with RT only. Intermediate- and high-risk CaP patients should be counseled about the possible declines in HRQoL associated with HT.

Impact of Subsequent Biopsies on Comprehensive Health Related Quality of Life in Patients with and without Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify the effects of subsequent prostate needle biopsies after the baseline biopsy on health related quality of life with time. We compared men with and without prostate cancer, and men who did and did not undergo followup prostate needle biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Included in analysis were patients enrolled in the Center for Prostate Disease Research Multicenter National Database between 2007 and 2015 who had low or favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer, were on active surveillance and underwent prostate needle biopsy for suspicion of prostate cancer. Patients completed the EPIC (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) and the RAND SF-36 (36-Item Short Form Health Survey) after baseline biopsy and at regular followup intervals. Mean health related quality of life was compared with time between patients who did and did not undergo subsequent prostate needle biopsies following baseline. RESULTS: Of the 637 patients included in study 129 (20.3%) with prostate cancer were on active surveillance and 508 (79.7%) were in the noncancer group. In the cancer and noncancer groups mean ± SD followup was 34.7 ± 16.9 and 31.6 ± 14.6 months, respectively. Of the patients with prostate cancer 54 (60.7%) underwent subsequent prostate needle biopsies compared with 114 (27.1%) without cancer. No significant impact on health related quality of life was observed in men who underwent subsequent prostate needle biopsies during a 5-year period. CONCLUSIONS: A subsequent prostate needle biopsy is required in most active surveillance protocols and in men with persistent suspicion of prostate cancer. Our analysis shows that subsequent prostate needle biopsies do not significantly impact health related quality of life.

Cáncer renal. Descripción poblacional en una institución académica / Kidney cancer. Population description in an academic institution

El conocimiento en cáncer renal ha sido manifiesto en la última década, con adelantos que optimizan el abordaje diagnóstico, quirúrgico y terapéutico con agentes dirigidos contra blancos específicos. El objetivo del trabajo fue la evaluación retrospectiva de pacientes con cáncer de riñón, destacando los datos demográficos, patológicos, quirúrgicos, de recurrencia, así como las modalidades terapéuticas empleadas, y describir la evolución clínica a través de parámetros de eficacia y seguridad. Fueron incluidos 417 pacientes, analizándose los datos de 356. La edad mediana fue de 56 años y 68% eran hombres. El 14% presentó otro tumor primario no renal y 14 desarrollaron otro tumor renal. El diagnóstico fue incidental en el 28% de los casos, la histología más frecuente fue el carcinoma de células claras, el tamaño mediano fue 6.1 cm y en el 20% se observó infiltración capsular. De los 298 pacientes operados, 54% fueron a nefrectomía radical y 26% parcial. El 19% presentaba metástasis al diagnóstico. Recurrencia post-operatoria en 75 de los 298 operados. Los tratamientos más frecuentemente utilizados en primera línea fueron los inhibidores de tirosina-quinasa (55% de los casos) con remisiones del 43-50% y un tiempo a la progresión de 12.1 meses. La revisión retrospectiva de los datos en cáncer renal de una población académica que incorpora la metodología diagnóstica, quirúrgica y terapéutica en enfermedad localizada y avanzada, permite reproducir los datos que surgen de países centrales y de estudios clínicos aleatorizados (AU)

Improving knowledge in renal cancer has been successful in the last decade in terms of diagnosis, surgical and therapeutic approach with targeted agents. The objective of the study was the retrospective evaluation of patients with kidney cancer, emphasizing recurrence as well as therapeutic modalities, pathological and surgical, demographic data and to describe outcome through efficacy and safety parameters. There were included 417 patients. The median age was of 56 years and 68% were men. There was a 14% of patients with another non-renal primary tumor and 14 patients developed another kidney tumor. The diagnosis was incidental in 28% of cases. The most common histology was clear cell carcinoma, medium size was 6.1 cm and capsular infiltration was observed in 20%. Of the 298 patients operated, 54% were to radical nephrectomy and 26% partial. The 19% of the patients had metastases from diagnosis. Post-operative recurrence was developed in 75 of 298 surgical patients. The most frequent systemic first line therapy was tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (55% of cases) with remissions of 43-50% and time to progression was 12.1 months. The retrospective review in renal cancer of an academic population gives the rationale of data of the real world and to compare with those that arise from central countries and randomized clinical trials (AU)